Summary
Husband held about 2.677 percent of his law firm. Wife's expert valued the interest at $142,000 using book value that included receivables and work in progress, while husband's expert applied the stock purchase agreement, which excludes those items, and reached $11,347. The trial court adopted the agreement value, except that it found goodwill separately (stipulated at $35,000). The Court of Appeal affirmed, finding substantial evidence supported the valuation and finding husband's protective cross-appeal on spousal support and fees moot.
What it means for the financial analysis
When valuing a minority interest in a professional firm, the analysis should address whether the interest carries any real claim to receivables and work in progress, and should examine the buy-sell agreement using the court's factors: timing, independent motive, and how closely the formula result matches other approaches. The court affirmed under a deferential standard and did not hold that a buy-sell formula must control or that discounts are required, and it expressly declined to decide whether minority and marketability discounts apply to professional corporations.
Read the full opinion on Google ScholarAlso available on CourtListener.